MG & Rover - XPower Forums banner
1 - 20 of 31 Posts

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
*Actually, sorry, no he doesn't.



TBH not a single good thing to say :slap::shake:

I've actually booked to borrow one for an afternoon in a few weeks time too, hope I have more luck!

The way 2nd hand prices are plummeting a 2nd hand early one, possibly next year WAS almost appealing. Some of the items in the article take the edge off this appeal though...
 

· Now in a 3
Joined
·
4,042 Posts
All I can say Garry is that over the last year and half I have hired an Audi a4, passat coupe, passat estate and last week an octavia diesel. I can honestly say that my mg6 is better than all of them.

Audi a4 was difficult to drive due to position of pedals
Passat coupe - stunning to look at nice to drive but had annoying interior rattles
Passat estate - same rattles as coupe
Skoda, well built, over complicated satnav/stereo, extremely boring and painful to dive.
 

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Have you seen the above article (its been posted up on .org), worrying thing to me is the crash protection - apparently the airbag doesn't inflate enough to stop you smashing your head on the wheel and there's a fair chance of hip / gentlemen's undercarriage (ahem!) damage in a crash! :agh:

Its all the stuff you can't see like this that bothers me tbh, along with the adverts trying to pass it off as British - I'd like mg a lot more if they actually admitted its Chinese.

I suspect a ZS given the same sort of test wouldn't fair much better, but then its a 15 - 20 years older design.

Gotta love the "stop / stop" technology fitted to the one JC had.

I don't doubt that you are having a great experience with yours, however I saw somewhere the other day the suggestion that the good ones will be good and the bad (Fri afternoon, as they used to be called) ones will be terrible.

From what I saw, "he who shall not be named" bought a crashed one to put back on the road but then actually gave up when it came to getting running right as mg were the wrong side of useless.
 

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Just had a look on .org and I see the usual suspects are all saying the test is a completely put up job and total BS on JCs part.

Mmmm, I wonder how likely it is that the Sunday Times would print a complete fabrication?

Also they ask if he was briefed on using the stop / start - any cars we've had with it haven't required a night class to use it correctly, is mg any different?

I may have to allow a full day for my trial - AM to have a crash course in use of handbrake, key and stop / start, possibly over running into part of PM, then PM (or remainder of) to actually drive it. Maybe I should have asked for a seven day trial?
 

· Now in a 3
Joined
·
4,042 Posts
NCAp test here......http://www.euroncap.com/files/467_datasheet.pdf

Similar to a Honda civic, only reason it's not 5* is because of pedestrian safety.

He who shall not be named certainly did not give up, and it was the dealer who couldn't help. Because it was a write off it has no warranty so mg wont touch it. He has now modified it, and even been to pod with it.

A guy in South Africa has just had his remapped to 190bhp without losing his warranty, we are waiting for further info on this.

If you do stall it you have to press the key in and remove it and put it back in, I suspect this is what jc didn't do.

Enjoy your test drive and make sure you get it on a mixture of roads.
 

· Passionate about MGR.Cars.
Joined
·
4,079 Posts
Apparently a few years ago JC was asked by Roache Bentley from the MG Owners Club to write an article for Enjoying MG for which he did then a while after he was asked to write another only the second time he copied someone elses text & submitted it to MGOC. Mr Bentley I understand was less than impressed & they fell out & JC didn't get paid. Ever since then he never had a good thing to say about MG or as we know MG-Rover.
Now I don't know if this is 100% correct but I was told it by an MGOC Member who is not of the mentality to make up rubbish.

I havn't read the article yet but I have seen the front cover where it said it broke down & he had to push it & i have to say the minute I read that I had/have strong doubts as to the truth TBH.
Any press will print rubbish if they think it will sell thus making money.

If there is little or no truth in it then it is up to MG to sue for damages, if they don't.....................
 

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
"If there is little or no truth in it then it is up to MG to sue for damages, if they don't....................."

No smoke without fire.
Not sure that JC or the Sunday Times would risk the wrath of one of the largest car manufacturers on the planet*
JC has really upset some over on .org but tbh a lot of what he says is bang on IMO.
£21k for top of range, unknown Chinese car is just ridiculous - hence why they "try" and push it as British in "all" the advertising.
If you were to change his review from the 6 to, say, the Titanic, the .org guys would just want him to mention accommodation and food, simply mentioning he arrived in the US "a little wet"! Just brushing over the slight sinking / loss of life issue totally. LOL

I'm hoping that test drive will go well, as a £5K, couple of year old runabout, the 6 is almost appealing. As a £18k (petrol TSE) its simply not.


*Windy, 2011
 

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Got to admit, the front cover made me LOL - didn't see it for a bit as the Times comes in about 37 sections and didn't realise I was looking at a part inside a part! :bh:

 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,099 Posts
he does have some valid points, new its very expensive for what it is, and you shouldn't need to read a manual for stop / start to work!!
 

· Front wheels steer, rear wheels drive.
Joined
·
12,330 Posts
quote
"He who shall not be named certainly did not give up, and it was the dealer who couldn't help. Because it was a write off it has no warranty so mg wont touch it. He has now modified it, and even been to pod with it."

was that the one last month when some of us went, it was a smart looking car tbh but it was painfully slow, i find it hard to believe it was modified , at least in the engine department?!?!?!
 

· Now in a 3
Joined
·
4,042 Posts
quote
"He who shall not be named certainly did not give up, and it was the dealer who couldn't help. Because it was a write off it has no warranty so mg wont touch it. He has now modified it, and even been to pod with it."

was that the one last month when some of us went, it was a smart looking car tbh but it was painfully slow, i find it hard to believe it was modified , at least in the engine department?!?!?!
Yes dave, I believe it was the same day. Only modification was the exhaust and a slightly larger inter cooler.


He is looking at getting it remapped before mg live, reckons he should be able to get 200bhp out of it. I think he went to pod to do reference runs.

It might be slow in comparison, but I've gone 100 plus on the twisties keeping a 911 at bay. And I'm more than happy with it.

Edit: happy with mine, not his!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
731 Posts
Yes dave, I believe it was the same day. Only modification was the exhaust and a slightly larger inter cooler.


He is looking at getting it remapped before mg live, reckons he should be able to get 200bhp out of it. I think he went to pod to do reference runs.

It might be slow in comparison, but I've gone 100 plus on the twisties keeping a 911 at bay. And I'm more than happy with it.

Edit: happy with mine, not his!
its not an easy ecu to talk to or crack, it is likely it will need removing from the car and have to go direct onto the pinouts in ecu to read file.

they are (the 1.8t) quite underpowered for the size of car with only 150bhp, even with 200bhp, it will not be fast, but will be a big improvement on standard.

The dealers and mg-uk wouldn't touch teh car because the airbags had blown - although if they are as bad as the post above says, you wonder if its worth having them?
The running issue was a faulty fuel pump in the end.

There are a lot of R75/ZT similarities, I don't know what floor pan the 6 was built on, but it seems many R75 running gear parts fit.
 

· Commission Number 000744
Joined
·
2,651 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
I think for "keeping at bay" read "holding up".
Sorry but even Windy wouldn't put a 6 and a 911 in the same category.
Just because someone isn't stoopid enough to overtake on the "twisties" doesn't make their car slower or inferior.
 
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top